Article Australian Advert Banned on UK TV

The article pertains to a ban imposed by the Broadcast Advertising Clearance Centre (BACC) in UK on a tourism advert by Australia because of a use of the sear word â€Å"bloody†. It further quotes the response of Director of Tourism Australia, Scott Morrison and indicates an element of ethnocentrism on part of the two nations.Advertising We will write a custom article sample on Article: Australian Advert Banned on UK TV specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More The advert exhibits the use of English language as a cultural dimension that unifies both the countries however; the psychological dimension is what distinguishes the two. The article stipulates a different value system and a difference in beliefs and cultural norms(BBC NEWS 2006). Hence the article has two aspects; one the one hand it is an amalgamation of cross cultural beliefs and values, it represents a promotion of acculturation whereby Tourism Australia attempts to prom ote a diffusion of cultural values using and a melting pot approach in promoting tourism in Australia. On the other hand it also elicits a sense of ethnocentrism, a cultural bias towards the belief of superiority of one’s own ethnic group. In a marketing perspective ethnocentrism can act as a deterrent in consumer purchasing decisions(Puzakova 2010). Where the advert itself represents an ethnocentric approach by Australia to promote its culture, the article represents and ethnocentric bias by UK as well in terms of believing that its language use is more appropriate than that of low-context culture of Australia. The differences in intercultural communication are evident. Whereby, Australians, based on this article, are more open in their use of language, the British seem more conservative indicating an insensitivity of variations in the international communication that lacks in the Australian advert(Chaney and Martin 2007). It can also be argued that conservatism, politeness, being reserved and formal in the use of language are perhaps just stereotypical characteristics that plague the British society. Research, according to Scott Morrison, shows an appreciation of the Australian sense of humour in the British population. Hence it could be in fact just an imposition of traditional values by the BACC to preserve its traditional front stage culture, ignoring the evolution of its backstage culture and a diversity of self concept in one culture. The ethnocentric bias is based on mindsets incorporating cultural and social factors and is developed through socializing agents like schools, families and friends and thus can be altered with a change in socializing agents(Puzakova 2010).Advertising Looking for article on communications media? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Thus the article is an example of xenophobia in its most ethereal forms which is persistent even in an era of massive globalization. Bi bliography BBC NEWS. Australian advert banned on UK TV. 2006. Web. Chaney, Lilian H, and Jeanette S. Martin. Intercultural Business Communication. India: Pearson Education Inc. , 2007. Lilian, Chanay H. Intercultural Business Communication. India: Pearson Education Inc, 2007. Mail Online. The world’s biggest family. 2011. Web. Mamman, Aminu. â€Å"Employee intercultural effectiveness in a multicultural workplace.† International Journal of Human Resource Management (Peason), 1995: 528-552. Puzakova, Marina. â€Å"Mitigating consumer ethnocentrism via advertising and media consumption in transitional markets.† 2010: 727-764.Advertising We will write a custom article sample on Article: Australian Advert Banned on UK TV specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Savani, Krishna. â€Å" Cultural Conditioning: Understanding Interpersonal Accommodation in India and the United States in Terms of the Modal Characteristics of I nterpersonal Influence Situations.† Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2011: 84-102. This article on Article: Australian Advert Banned on UK TV was written and submitted by user Man-Thing to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.

Arguements against cloning essays

Arguements against cloning essays In 1997 the world was introduced to a six month old lamb named Dolly, the first successfully cloned mammal, putting everyone around the world into shock. The time has come where our technology in science and medicine have advanced so much that human cloning has left science fiction and has now progressed into science. A high percent of people feel that there could be nothing good we could get out of cloning human beings and nothing scientifically or medically important would be lost by banning colonal reproduction (Kass). According to a poll taken by CCN of 1,005 adults in 1997, 69% said they are afraid of the possibility to clone humans, 89% feel it is morally unacceptable, and 74% believe human cloning is against Gods will (Robinson). There are, however, those who support the cloning of humans. A select amount of scientist feel that research cloning will lead to cures and treatments for the sick and cloning would also allow people to produce or raise a child to whom they are b iologically connected (Wachbroit). Although these are a few hopes of creating a human clone, such processes should be banned not only because they are extremely risky for the clones and the women who would birth them, but it would also diminish our world that is valued for individuality, despite the feelings of cloning supporters on the contrary. Although many scientists who support cloning do so in good intentions to help create cures for those who have diseases that we do not have treatments for, there are other ways of doing so without cloning. It would almost be impossible to restrict some forms of human cloning without banning it completely. The lives of humans are more valuable than to risk one for the benefit of another. Also, once research cloning is allowed and embryos become available, even the tightest regulations would not be able to prevent to birth of cloned babies (Robinson). Instead of using cloning to m...